Against the backdrop of intensified global climate change and surging demand for building energy conservation, the insulation performance of metal buildings (especially medium-sized industrial/warehousing/agricultural facilities such as 30×40 meters) has become a core element in reducing operating costs and meeting environmental regulations. For 30×40 metal buildings, choosing a sandwich panel that takes into account insulation efficiency, structural strength, durability and economy is a topic of common concern for owners, contractors and designers. This article will start from the development trend of building insulation materials, combine the actual needs of 30×40 metal buildings, analyze the performance differences of mainstream sandwich panels, and propose cost-effective solutions.
1. Global building insulation trends
In recent years, the requirements for insulation materials in the global construction field have been upgraded from single insulation to comprehensive performance competition in energy saving, environmental protection and safety. This trend is particularly evident in major markets such as Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific:
EU: According to EPBD, all new buildings after 2030 must meet near-zero energy consumption standards, promoting the popularization of high thermal conductivity (low K value) and recyclable insulation materials.
North America: The US ASHRAE standard (90.1) and LEED certification system emphasize that insulation materials must simultaneously meet fire resistance (such as ASTM E84 combustion rating), moisture resistance (water absorption rate ≤1%) and long-term thermal stability (no attenuation for more than 10 years).
Asia Pacific: China’s “dual carbon” goals (carbon peak in 2030 and carbon neutrality in 2060) promote the transformation of industrial and civil buildings to high-efficiency insulation and low-carbon materials. The annual growth rate of demand for environmentally friendly sandwich panels such as rock wool and polyurethane (PU) exceeds 12% (data source: Global Market Insights).
Core conclusion: The selection of insulation sandwich panels for 30×40 metal buildings needs to adapt to local climatic conditions (such as low thermal conductivity requirements in cold areas and moisture resistance requirements in humid and hot areas), and comply with regional green building regulations to avoid rework or increased operating costs due to substandard materials.
2. Special requirements for 30×40 metal buildings
30×40 meter metal buildings are mostly industrial plants, storage and logistics centers or agricultural greenhouses, and their use scenarios put forward more stringent requirements for thermal insulation sandwich panels:
Large span structural support: Metal buildings have a large span (30 meters), and sandwich panels must have sufficient bending strength and impact resistance to avoid core material breakage due to deadweight or external loads.
Long-term durability: Metal buildings are mostly located outdoors and need to resist aging factors such as ultraviolet rays, rain erosion, and salt spray (coastal areas). The bonding force between the core material and the panel (color steel plate/aluminum-magnesium-manganese plate) of the sandwich panel must be ≥0.1MPa (industry standard).
Multifunctional adaptability: Some 30×40 buildings need to take into account insulation and sound insulation (such as factory noise reduction), fire prevention (such as storage of flammable goods) or photovoltaic integration (roof integrated solar panels), and sandwich panels need to reserve installation interfaces or have compatibility.
Key indicators: thermal conductivity (K value, the lower the better the insulation), core material density (≥40kg/m³ to ensure strength), fire rating (A1/A2 is the highest), water absorption rate (≤1% to prevent expansion and deformation).
3. Comparison of mainstream insulation sandwich panels
The mainstream metal building insulation sandwich panels on the market can be divided into four categories according to the core material, and their performance and applicable scenarios are significantly different:
3.1 Polyurethane (PU) sandwich panels
Core advantages: thermal conductivity is only 0.022-0.027W/(m·K) (about 1/2 of EPS), and the insulation performance is top-notch. The core material density is 40-60kg/m³, the compressive strength is ≥150kPa, and it is suitable for large-span structures. The combustion performance can reach B1 level (self-extinguishing when away from the fire), and some PU boards with added flame retardants can reach A2 level.
Limitations: The price of raw materials (isocyanate) fluctuates greatly, and the initial cost is 20%-30% higher than EPS. It may release trace harmful gases in high temperature environments (>80℃) (must comply with EN 13501-1 standards).
Typical scenarios: Industrial plants in cold regions (such as Northeast and Northern Europe), cold chain warehousing, and high-demand constant temperature workshops.
3.2 Polystyrene (EPS) sandwich panels
Core advantages: Lowest cost (about 60% of PU), thermal conductivity 0.035-0.045W/(m·K), suitable for normal temperature (15-25℃) environment, light core material (density 15-30kg/m³), easy to transport and install.
Limitations: Poor fire resistance (mostly B2/B3 grade), easy to shrink and drip when exposed to open flames; high water absorption (about 3%-5%), easy to expand and deform in humid areas, and obvious thermal resistance attenuation after long-term use (more than 10 years).
Typical scenarios: Temporary warehouses and agricultural greenhouses in warm and dry areas (such as South China and the Middle East during the non-rainy season) (moisture-proof coating is required).
3.3 Rockwool (RW) sandwich panels
Core advantages: Top fire resistance (A1 grade non-combustible), suitable for high-risk places such as chemical and electric power; thermal conductivity 0.040-0.048W/(m·K), thermal insulation performance slightly better than EPS, core material density 100-150kg/m³, high compressive strength (≥60kPa), strong impact resistance.
Limitations: Heavy weight (2-3 times heavier than PU), high load-bearing requirements for metal frames, high water absorption (up to 10% without waterproofing), additional moisture-proof layer required in humid environments, low installation efficiency (high density leads to difficulty in handling).
Typical scenarios: Areas with high fire protection requirements (such as oil storage, metallurgical plants), rainy and humid areas (waterproof membrane is required).
3.4 Glass wool (GW) sandwich panel
Core advantages: thermal conductivity 0.040-0.045W/(m·K), thermal insulation performance close to rock wool, high fiber fineness, outstanding sound absorption and noise reduction performance (suitable for factories that need sound insulation).
Limitations: poor alkali resistance (susceptible to concrete corrosion), mainly used in non-humid environments, fibers are easy to float, and protective equipment must be worn during installation; the cost is slightly higher than EPS (about 10%-15% more expensive).
Typical scenarios: light industrial factories that need noise reduction (such as textile factories and electronic assembly workshops).
4. Cost-effective solutions for 30×40 metal buildings
Combining global trends with the actual needs of 30×40 metal buildings, cost-effectiveness requires balancing the initial purchase cost and the full life cycle operating cost (such as energy consumption, maintenance, and replacement costs). The following are recommended solutions for different scenarios:
4.1 Cold/severely cold regions (such as Northeast China, Russia, and Northern Europe): PU sandwich panels are preferred
Reason: Although the initial cost of PU is relatively high, its ultra-low thermal conductivity can significantly reduce winter heating energy consumption (measured data: under the same conditions, PU sandwich panel buildings save 25%-30% more energy than EPS buildings). Combined with the good air tightness of metal buildings, the long-term electricity savings can cover the material price difference within 5-8 years.
Recommended configuration: thickness 80-100mm (K value ≤ 0.35W/(m²·K)), panel is 0.5mm thick color steel plate (or aluminum-magnesium-manganese plate, which is more corrosion-resistant), core material density 50kg/m³ (balance strength and cost).
4.2 Warm/dry regions (such as South China, the Middle East, and Australia): EPS+moisture-proof coating sandwich panels
Reason: The demand for heating in warm regions is low in winter, and the thermal insulation performance of EPS is sufficient. By coating the surface with a waterproof and breathable membrane (such as PVDF coating), the water absorption rate of EPS can be reduced to less than 1%, avoiding moisture expansion, and the low cost advantage can reduce the pressure of initial investment.
Recommended configuration: thickness 50-70mm (K value ≤ 0.45W/(m²·K)), panel is 0.4mm thick color steel plate (sprayed with anti-rust paint), core material density 25kg/m³ (lightweight design reduces frame load).
4.3 Fire prevention/high safety demand scenarios (such as chemical parks, logistics warehousing): rock wool sandwich panel
Reason: The A1 fire resistance of rock wool can meet the most stringent fire protection regulations (such as EU EN 13501-1, China GB 8624), avoiding major losses caused by fire. Despite the heavy weight, the frame of 30×40 metal buildings is usually designed to bear ≥1.5kN/m² and can be easily adapted.
Recommended configuration: thickness 100-120mm (K value ≤ 0.40W/(m²·K)), panel is 0.6mm thick galvanized steel plate (enhanced impact resistance), core material density 120kg/m³ (taking into account both fire resistance and strength).
4.4 General solution: PU+aluminum foil composite sandwich panel
Reason: PU has top thermal insulation performance, the aluminum foil layer can reflect far-infrared heat radiation (increase thermal insulation efficiency by 5%-8%), and has moisture-proof and UV resistance functions (suitable for tropical areas with strong UV rays). Although the cost is higher than ordinary PU, the comprehensive performance is more stable, suitable for owners with high quality requirements.
Against the backdrop of global building energy conservation and green transformation, the selection of thermal insulation sandwich panels for 30×40 metal buildings must follow the three principles of climate adaptation, regulatory compliance, and cost optimization. For most projects, PU sandwich panels (cold regions) and EPS+moisture-proof coating sandwich panels (warm regions) are the most cost-effective options. If fire prevention or high durability is required, rock wool sandwich panels are a must. The final solution must be combined with the specific project’s geographical location, functional positioning (industry/warehousing/agriculture), and budget cycle (5 years/10 years or more) to make a comprehensive decision, avoiding the misunderstanding of only looking at prices or blindly pursuing high-end products.
Tip: When purchasing, be sure to ask the supplier to provide a third-party test report (thermal conductivity, fire rating, water absorption, etc.), and verify the long-term performance stability of the material through field case investigation. After all, the life of the thermal insulation sandwich panel determines the return on investment of the 30×40 metal building.
Send us the inquiry form